Skip to main content

Morphology and histology of the olfactory organ of two African lungfishes, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi (Lepidosirenidae, Dipnoi)

Abstract

The olfactory organs of two African lungfishes, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi, were investigated using a stereo microscope and a compound light microscope and were described anatomically, histologically, and histochemically. Like other lungfishes, these species present the following general features: i) elongated olfactory chamber (OC), ii) anterior nostril at the ventral tip of the upper lip, iii) posterior nostril on the palate of the oral cavity, iv) lamellae with multiple cell types such as olfactory receptor neurons, supporting cells, basal cells, lymphatic cells, and mucous cells (MC), and vi) vomero-like epithelial crypt (VEC) made of glandular epithelium (GE) and crypt sensory epithelium. Some of these features exhibit differences between species: MCs are abundant in both the lamellar and inner walls of the OC in P. amphibius but occur only in lamellae in P. dolloi. On the other hand, some between feature differences are consistent across species: the GE of both P. amphibius and P. dolloi is strongly positive for Alcian blue (pH 2.5)-periodic acid Schiff (deep violet coloration), and positive with hematoxylin and eosin and with Masson’s trichrome (reddish-brown staining), unlike the MCs of the two species which stain dark red with both Alcian blue (pH 2.5)-periodic acid Schiff and Masson’s trichrome but respond faintly to hematoxylin and eosin. The differing abundance of MCs in the two lungfishes might reflect different degrees in aerial exposure of the olfactory organ, while the neutral and acid mucopolysaccharide-containing VEC, as indicated by staining properties of the MCs, is evolutionary evidence that P. amphibius and P. dolloi are the closest living relatives to tetrapods, at least in the order Dipnoi.

Introduction

In vertebrates, olfaction provokes ecologically fundamental behaviors (predator avoidance, migration, reproduction, food searching, etc.). The physical response is initially stimulated by the olfactory epithelium, which is in direct contact with external factors (Ache and Young 2005). The signal transduction process generally involves the following steps: begins in olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) as a chemical stimulus above a threshold, passes along axons, and finally terminates within the olfactory bulb (OB) (Hara 1986). However, fish and higher tetrapods have different olfactory systems and electro-physiological signal pathways. Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes have only a single main olfactory organ (MOO) with variable numbers of lamellae (Yamamoto 1982; Ferrando et al. 2016). Consequently, they use only a fluid-filled MOO that is traced to the main olfactory bulb (MOB). Contrary to lower vertebrates, tetrapods utilize not only air-filled MOOs, but also a fluid-filled vomeronasal organ that has long sensory microvilli and terminates within the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) (Barber and Raisman 1974; Jones and Reed 1989; Halpern et al. 1995; Trotier and Døving 1998; Nowack and Wöhrmann-Repenning 2009). Interestingly, lungfish, the closest living relative to tetrapods (Brinkmann et al. 2004), have the vomeronasal organ within the olfactory organ. The lungfish vomeronasal organ has been described as a “recess epithelium” by Nakamuta et al. (2013) and a “vomeronasal-like epithelial crypt (VEC)” by Wittmer and Nowack (2017). This organ has been discussed as a unique olfactory-related structure unknown in other fish taxa (Bertmar 1981; Eisthen 1992; González et al. 2010).

The lungfish is a so-called “living fossil” as it retains primitive characteristics including well-developed lobed fins and is excellently adapted to semi-aquatic life on extremely dry land as well as under water (Jorgensen 2010). Distributed throughout Australia, South America, and Africa (Jorgensen 2010), all six lungfish species are obligate air breathers with a lung-like structure of a vascularized swim bladder. In contrast, other amphibious fishes have diverse respiratory systems such as gills, skin, buccal cavities, and intestines (Sanchez and Glass 2001; Jaafar and Murdy 2017). Such amphibious fishes also display unique olfactory organs in the nostril, chamber, and sac as well as development and composition of the sensory region and olfactory cell contents for terrestrial adaptation to air exposure (Jaafar and Murdy 2017; Kim et al. 2019; Kim and Park 2020). Among them, the lungfish olfactory organ has fascinated many researchers who concentrate on the relationship between structure and vertebrate evolution. This aspect has been studied in the West African lungfish Protopterus annectens (Derivot 1984), the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri (Theisen 1972), the spotted lungfish P. dolloi (González et al., 2010), and the South American lungfish Lepidosiren paradoxa (Wittmer and Nowack 2017). Those studies provide understanding of how lungfishes have evolved their olfactory organ to anatomically and histologically adapted to life both on land and in the water and give insight into the phylogenetic placement of lungfish in a different lineage from most extant teleost species (Marshall et al. 2011). Among the two species studied here, however, such research has not previously been carried out on the gilled lungfish P. amphibius, and interspecific comparisons have not been made.

Although lungfishes possess some vital features for terrestrial life, they show detailed differences in adaptive mechanisms: the marbled lungfishes P. aethiopicus and P. annectens are better at reducing ammonia production than is the spotted lungfish P. dolloi, illustrating different adaptive responses to air exposure (Loong et al. 2005). This study focuses on the anatomy and histology of the olfactory organ of two lungfishes, P. amphibius and P. dolloi, with interspecific comparison and discussion of differences from other amphibious fishes.

Materials and methods

Specimen preparation

African lungfishes (standard length 15.5 cm and 22.2 cm in P. amphibius; 24.0 cm and 27.2 cm in P. dolloi; Fig. 1a and b) were purchased at a fish market (Aquapro), having been imported from Kenya on 26 August 2020 and from Congo on 15 September 2020, respectively. The two species are easily classified by differences in body color (uniform blue body and pale grey belly in P. amphibius vs. dark brown body in P. dolloi, Jorgensen 2010). For histology, living lungfishes were anesthetized with MS-222 (tricaine methanesulfonate; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and immediately fixed with neutral 10% formalin solution buffered at pH 7.4. All research procedures were conducted by the rules of the Jeonbuk National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Fig. 1
figure1

External morphology of the olfactory organ in two lungfishes, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi. Blue bent lines indicate incurrent water flowing. Red broken lines indicate the olfactory chamber. AN, anterior nostril; OC, olfactory chamber; PN, posterior nostril; SC, sensory canal; SL, sensory line. The bars indicate 8 cm

Microscopic investigation

The fixed olfactory organs were extracted from the fishes’ snouts using a surgery blade under a dissecting scope (Stemi DV4, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The tissues were dehydrated with an ascending alcohol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100%), cleared with xylene, and embedded in paraffin wax. The tissue-containing wax blocks were cut into five-micrometer sections; stained with either Harris’ hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson’s trichrome, or Alcian blue (pH 2.5)-periodic acid Schiff (AB-PAS); and photographed under a light microscope (Imager A1, Carl Zeiss). The olfactory cells were identified with reference to Wittmer and Nowack (2017).

Results

External morphology

The two African lungfishes possess paired olfactory organs that are embedded at the ventral snout close to the oral cavity (Fig. 1a and b). They have a singular elongated olfactory chamber (OC) that is anteriorly open to the outside via the anterior nostril (AN) and posteriorly penetrates the palate of the oral cavity via the posterior nostril (PN). The OC contains at least 20 lamellae.

Histology

In images of cross-sectioned histological material, the two lungfishes are characterized by two olfactory systems, a main olfactory organ (MOO) and a vomero-like epithelial crypt (VEC), which are separated by connective tissue and surrounded by aniline blue-positive cartilaginous bone (Fig. 2a and b). The MOO has longitudinally arranged lamellae that extend into the roof and the bottom of the OC. The lamellae consist of a sensory epithelium (SE) and a non-sensory epithelium (NSE) (Fig. 2a and b). The SE is a pseudostratified columnar layer consisting of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs), supporting cells (SCs), basal cells (BCs), and lymphatic cells (LCs) (Fig. 2c and d). The ORNs comprise bipolar neurons with a spherical nucleus, dendrites with cilia on their apical surfaces, and an axon running into the basement membrane. Their nuclei are positive for hematoxylin, staining a dark violet color. Their dendrites and axons stain a weak pink color for acidic eosin Y staining. The cylindrical SCs have a nucleus that stains a weaker violet color than that of the ORNs and have long motile cilia on their apical surface. The oval BCs remain horizontal along the basement membrane. The LCs are very small cells with a spherical nucleus and are scattered between the SCs of the upper epithelial layer. The NSE is a stratified squamous epithelium consisting of one to three cell layers and containing stratified epithelial cells (SECs) and mucous cells (MCs) (Fig. 2e-j). The SECs make up the majority of the NSE and have a polygonal nucleus and cytoplasm that stains weakly with eosin. The MCs are large cells with a basal nucleus, numerous granules, and a faint response to H&E stain. They also stain dark red in both AB-PAS and Masson’s trichrome. Such MCs are abundant in the epithelia of the inner cells of the OC in P. amphibius but are lacking in P. dolloi.

Fig. 2
figure2

Histological characteristics of the cross-sectioned main olfactory organ in two lungfishes, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (c, d, e, h), alcian blue (pH 2.5)- periodic acid Schiff (f, g, i, j), and Masson’s trichrome (a, b). a, the main and accessory olfactory organs of P. amphibius; b, the main and accessory olfactory organs of P. dolloi; c, the sensory epithelium of the main olfactory organ of P. amphibius; d, the sensory epithelium of the main olfactory organ of P. dolloi; e, f, the lateral non-sensory wall of the olfactory chamber of P. amphibius; g, the non-sensory epithelium of lamella of P. amphibius; h, i, the lateral non-sensory wall of the olfactory chamber of P. dolloi; j, the non-sensory epithelium of lamella of P. dolloi. BC, basal cell; Ci, motile cilia; D, dendrite; LC, lymphatic cell; MC, mucous cell; ORN, olfactory receptor neuron; SC, supporting cell; SEC, stratified epithelial cell. The bars indicate 500 μm in (a and b), 50 μm in (c-j)

The VEC of both lungfishes is located under the MOO (Fig. 2a and b) and has two distinct parts, a glandular epithelium (GE) and a crypt sensory epithelium (CSE) (Fig. 3a-f). Commonly, the GE is a single layer of elongated secretory cells that have a small oval nucleus at the bottom and a slender cytoplasm extending from the basal to the central region of the VEC. With staining, the GE stains a reddish-brown color with H&E and Masson’s trichrome and a dark violet color with AB-PAS. The CSE is a pseudostratified epithelium with bipolar neurons, presenting nuclei in diverse layers of the epithelium. It stains a weak pink with H&E, violet with AB-PAS, and brown with Masson’s trichrome.

Fig. 3
figure3

The vomero-like epithelial crypt of Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (a, d), alcian blue (pH 2.5)- periodic acid Schiff (b, e), and Masson’s trichrome (c, f). a, b, c indicate P. amphibius and d, e, f indicate P. dolloi. CSE sensory epithelium; GE, glandular epithelium. The bars indicate 50 μm

Discussion

The olfactory organs of two extant lungfish, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi, which retain primitive characteristics and have the ability to breathe air, were investigated and compared to those of other amphibious fishes that possess excellent tolerance to being out of water. Based on morphological and histological study, the olfactory organs of the two lungfish species revealed the following primitive characteristics: i) an elongated OC with several lamellae, ii) an AN at the ventral tip of the upper lip, iii) a PN at the palate of the oral cavity, iv) a MOO with longitudinal lamellae, v) lamellae consisting of ORNs, SCs, BCs, LCs, and MCs, and vi) a VEC made up of the GE and the CSE, as reported in other lungfishes (Derivot 1984; Nakamuta et al. 2013; Wittmer and Nowack 2017). Among these features, the elongated lungfish OC resembles those of amphibious mudskippers of the subfamily Oxudercinae (Kuciel et al. 2013). In particular, the Asian swamp eel Monopterus albus possesses a pipe-like chamber penetrating the dorsal snout (Kim 2018). Nevertheless, there are some differences in the organ structure between lungfishes and other amphibious fishes. First, the two lungfishes have several folded lamellae ascending from the inner wall of the OC, whereas mudskippers have no such suspended lamellae (Kuciel et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2019). In other lungfish, the number of lamellae per one rosette row was 8 to 37 in adult P. annectens (80–550 mm in total body length) and 2 to 26 in adult Lepidosiren paradoxa (80–560 mm) (Nakamuta et al. 2013; Wittmer and Nowack 2017). Unfortunately, we could not obtain useful statistical data on the lamellae due to a shortage of specimens (only two lungfish per species). Nevertheless, we confirmed that that P. amphibius and P. dolloi have at least 20 lamellae each. In this respect, although mudskippers and lungfishes both successfully live a terrestrial life with aerial exposure, the dependance on the sensory organ might be different between two. More advanced mudskippers commonly have remarkably large eyes as an adaption to terrestrial activity (Sayer 2005; Jaafar and Murdy 2017), whereas lungfishes, which estivate in a cocoon when exposed to air, possess unremarkable “degenerate” eyes (Marshall et al. 2011).

Second, the two lungfishes possess no accessory nasal sac or any appendage for olfactory ventilation, unlike mudskippers that have one or two sacs (Kuciel et al. 2013). In amphibious fish, the accessory nasal sac generates a suction force toward the OC by increasing the internal pressure and helps take up water in shallow stagnant water or on wet land with little water (Nevitt 1991; Kuciel 2013). Unlike mudskippers, the OC of the two lungfishes has no ANS but penetrates toward the oral cavity. We hypothesize that the much larger oral-cavity volume of P. amphibius and P. dolloi, relative to ANS-containing amphibious fishes, is used for odorant residue elimination.

Of particularly interest is the distribution of MCs in the two lungfish species studied here: MCs are abundant in both the lamellae and chamber inner wall in P. amphibius but are scarce and only found in the lamella in P. dolloi. In fish skin, the mucus secreted by MCs has a large range of physiological functions: i) protection against harmful chemical or physical factors, ii) disease resistance, iii) ion and water regulation, and iv) respiratory gas exchange (Shephard, 1994). In addition, Horn and Riegle (1981) and Laming et al. (1982) found that enhanced mucous secretions prevent water loss in stichaeoid fish and shanny (L. pholis) exposed to aerial conditions. In this view, P. amphibius, with more abundant MCs than P. dolloi, can be regarded as having a different cytological strategy for aerial exposure of the olfactory organ.

Histochemically, the properties of the MCs in teleost olfactory organ can be classified into acidic or neutral mucopolysaccharide and glycoprotein according to the mixed ratio of protein and carboxylate. As the two lungfishes show a deep red color with AB (pH 2.5)-PAS but a faint color with H&E, it was concluded that MCs have only a neutral mucopolysaccharide with less ionized amino acids (Gona 1979).

The GE of the VEC in P. amphibius and P. dolloi was different from the MCs of the MOO: reddish-brown vs. faint with H&E and Masson’s trichrome and dark violet vs. dark red with AB (pH 2.5)-PAS. These features of the GE are due to acid and neutral mucopolysaccharide with much protein mass, as in other lungfish species with much granule protein (Nakamuta et al. 2013; Wittmer and Nowack 2017). Nevertheless, additional approaches are needed for identifying proteins.

Wittmer and Nowack (2017) reported two types of secretary glands, a glandular duct cell and an elongated glandular cell (glandular epithelium), but we confirmed only one type of secretory gland, the GE, in the VEC to produce mucus. The GE with AB (pH 2.5)-PAS reaction has been variably expressed in lungfishes: PAS positive but Alcian blue negative in P. annectens (Nakamuta et al. 2013), Alcian blue (pH 2.5) positive but PAS negative in L. paradoxa, and both Alcian blue and PAS positive in P. annectens (Wittmer and Nowack 2017). Tierney (2015) stated that glandular secretion of proteins is not important in fish olfaction. Meanwhile, Wittmer and Nowack (2017) suggested that protein-containing mucopolysaccharide participates in the sensory mechanism at least in the lungfish olfactory system, and the Alcian blue-positive GE functions to remove odorant residues with acidic mucus. Based on our results, we think that the VEC is deeply related to lungfish olfaction.

Consequently, we confirmed that the difference in density of MCs in P. amphibius and P. dolloi reflects different degrees of aerial exposure during their lives, and acid and neutral mucopolysaccharide-containing VEC is evolutionary evidence for lungfishes as the closest living relative to tetrapods, at least in the order Dipnoi.

Conclusion

Two African lungfishes, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi, are the closest living relatives to tetrapods and are obligate air breathers excellently adapted to a semi-aquatic lifestyle that exploits dry land and freshwater environments. The elongated olfactory chamber; the anterior nostril at the ventral tip of the upper lip; the posterior nostril penetrating the oral palate; the main olfactory organ with several lamellae; the lamella consisting of olfactory receptor neurons, supporting cells, basal cells, lymphatic cells, and mucous cells; and the vomero-like epithelial crypt are general characteristics shared with other lungfishes. Among them, MC density are unique between the two lungfishes and the VEC of P. amphibius and P. dolloi is very similar in mucopolysaccharide and protein composition. The different MC densities between these two African lungfishes are related to different degrees of aerial exposure of the olfactory organ, and the VEC is evolutionary evidence for lungfishes as the closest living relative to tetrapods, at least in the order Dipnoi.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. B.W. Ache, J.M. Young, Olfaction: Diverse species, conserved principles. Neuron 48, 417–430 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P.C. Barber, G. Raisman, An autoradiographic investigation of the projection of the vomeronasal organ to the accessory olfactory bulb in the mouse. Brain Res. 81, 21–30 (1974)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Bertmar, Evolution of vomeronasal organs in vertebrates. Evolution 35, 359–366 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Brinkmann, B. Venkatesh, S. Brenner, A. Meyer, Nuclear protein-coding genes support lungfish and not the coelacanth as the closest living relatives of land vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 4900–4905 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.H. Derivot, Functional anatomy of the peripheral olfactory system of the African lungfish Protopterus annectens Owen: Macroscopic, microscopic, and morphometric aspects. Am. J. Anat. 169, 177–192 (1984)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H.L. Eisthen, Phylogeny of the vomeronasal system and of receptor cell types in the olfactory and vomeronasal epithelia of vertebrates. Mic. Res Tech. 23, 1–21 (1992)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ferrando, L. Gallus, L. Ghigliotti, M. Vacchi, J. Nielsen, J.S. Christiansen, E. Pisano, Gross morphology and histology of the olfactory organ of the Greenland shark Somniosus microcephalus. Polar Biol. 39, 1399–1409 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Gona, Mucous glycoproteins of teleostean fish: A comparative histochemical study. Histochem. J. 11, 709–718 (1979)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. González, R. Morona, J.M. López, N. Moreno, G.R. Northcutt, Lungfishes, like tetrapods, possess a vomeronasal system. Front. Neuroanat. 4, 130 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Halpern, L.S. Shapiro, C. Jia, Differential localization of G proteins in the opossum vomeronasal system. Brain Res. 677, 157–161 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T.J. Hara, in The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. Role of Olfaction in Fish Behaviour (Springer, US, 1986), pp. 152–176

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. M.H. Horn, K.C. Riegle, Evaporative water loss and intertidal vertical distribution in relation to body size and morphology of stichaeoid fishes from California. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 50, 273–288 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Jaafar, E.O. Murdy, Fishes out of Water: Biology and Ecology of Mudskippers (CRC Press, USA, 2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. D.T. Jones, R.R. Reed, Golf: An olfactory neuron specific-G protein involved in odorant signal transduction. Science 244, 790–795 (1989)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Jorgensen, The Biology of Lungfishes (Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.T. Kim, in Ph. D. Dissertation, Chonbuk National University, South Korea. A Comparative Anatomy and Histology of the Olfactory Organ of 17 Fishes in South Korea (2018), p. 175

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.T. Kim, J.Y. Park, Microscopic research on the olfactory organ of the blue spotted mudskipper Boleophthalmus pectinirostris, compared to a related sympatric mudskipper. Ocean Sci. J. 55, 563–572 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H.T. Kim, S.W. Yun, J.Y. Park, Anatomy, histology, and histochemistry of the olfactory organ of the Korean shuttles mudskipper Periophthalmus modestus. J. Morphol. 280, 1485–1491 (2019)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Kuciel, The mechanism of olfactory organ ventilation in Periophthalmus barbarus (Gobiidae, Oxudercinae). Zoomorphology 132, 81–85 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Kuciel, K. Żuwała, U. Satapoomin, Comparative morphology (SEM) of the peripheral olfactory organ in the Oxudercinae subfamily (Gobiidae, Perciformes). Zool. Anz. 252, 424–430 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P.R. Laming, C.W. Funston, D. Roberts, M.J. Armstrong, Behavioural, physiological and morphological adaptations of the shanny (Blennius pholis) to the intertidal habitat. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 62, 329–338 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A.M. Loong, K.C. Hiong, S.M.L. Lee, W.P. Wong, S.F. Chew, Y.K. Ip, Ornithine-urea cycle and urea synthesis in African lungfishes, Protopterus aethiopicus and Protopterus annectens, exposed to terrestrial conditions for six days. J. Exp. Zool. 303, 354–365 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Marshall, S. Collin, N. Hart, H. Bailes, in The Biology of Lungfishes. Vision in Lungfish (Science Publishers Inc, USA, 2011), pp. 447–476

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Nakamuta, N. Nakamuta, K. Taniguchi, K. Taniguchi, Localization of the primordial vomeronasal organ and its relationship to the associated gland in lungfish. J. Anat. 222, 481–485 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G.A. Nevitt, Do fish sniff? A new mechanism of olfactory sampling in pleuronectid flounders. J. Exp. Biol. 157, 1–18 (1991)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Nowack, A. Wöhrmann-Repenning, New anatomical analyses suggest a pumping mechanism for the vomeronasal organ in anurans. Copeia 2009, 1–6 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A.P. Sanchez, M.L. Glass, Effects of environmental hypercapnia on pulmonary ventilation of the south American lungfish. J. Fish Biol. 58, 1181–1189 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M.D. Sayer, Adaptations of amphibious fish for surviving life out of water. Fish Fish. 6, 186–211 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K.L. Shephard, Functions for fish mucus. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 4, 401–429 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. B. Theisen, Ultrastructure of the olfactory epithelium in the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri. Acta Zool. 53, 205–218 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. K.B. Tierney, in Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation: Modern Perspectives, ed. by R. L. Doty. Olfaction in Aquatic Vertebrates (Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, 2015), pp. 547–564

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Trotier, K.B. Døving, Anatomical description of a new organ in the nose of domesticated animals’ by Ludvig Jacobson (1813). Chem. Senses 23, 743–754 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Wittmer, C. Nowack, Epithelial crypts: A complex and enigmatic olfactory organ in African and south American lungfish (Lepidosireniformes, Dipnoi). J. Morphol. 278, 791–800 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Yamamoto, in Chemoreception in Fishes, ed. by T. J. Hara. Comparative Morphology of the Peripheral Olfactory Organs in Teleosts (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 39–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No applicable.

Funding

This research was a part of the project titled “Development of Electronic illustrated book for ornamental fish”, funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea, G22202004702001.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hyun Tae Kim wrote text and made the figures. Jong Young Park edited and approved the manuscript for publication. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Young Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.T., Park, J.Y. Morphology and histology of the olfactory organ of two African lungfishes, Protopterus amphibius and P. dolloi (Lepidosirenidae, Dipnoi). Appl. Microsc. 51, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42649-021-00054-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aerial exposure
  • Evolutionary evidence
  • Lungfish
  • Mucous cell
  • Vomero-like epithelial crypt