Skip to main content

Anatomy, ultrastructure and histology of the olfactory organ of the largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides, Centrarchidae

Abstract

The detailed anatomy, ultrastructure and histology of the olfactory organ of Micropterus salmoides were investigated by a stereo microscope, a light microscope, and a scanning electron microscope. Its external structure shows a tube-like anterior nostril to stick out and a posterior nostril flat to the skin surface. Meanwhile, its internal structure, the olfactory chamber, contains a fan-shaped rosette structure with 9 to 11 lamellae in adult fish over 35 cm in standard length (SL) and two accessory nasal sacs (ethmoidal and lacrimal sacs) were found. Interestingly, the rosette in young fish under 15 cm in SL was a longitudinal structure in parallel with each of 4–5 lamellae. Histologically, the sensory epithelium (SE) on the olfactory chamber consists of 5 types of cells: olfactory receptor neurons, supporting cells, basal cells, lymphatic cells and mucous cells. In contrast, the non-sensory epithelium (NSE) has stratified epithelial cells, lymphatic cells and mucous cells. The mucous cells of the SE are abundant and distributed densely in one row on the outermost superficial surface, but the one of the NSE are less than the SE. From these results, the olfactory characters of M. salmoides may be related with its ecological habit spending in the middle layer of stagnant water contaminated, more or less.

Introduction

Sensory system, as a process of which teleost fishes respond to diverse stimuli in aquatic milieu, largely is classified into mechano- and chemo- receptions by their differences in a route of innervation, a passage of signal transduction cascade, and a type of stimulation (Hara 1986; Okada 2015). Among them, the olfaction is one of chemoreception that senses only a mixed aquatic compound such as hazard molecules, hormones, bile acid and amino acids dissolved in animal’s habitat, through the dendrites of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to contact the surface of the epithelia (Hara 1994; Hanson et al. 1998). In particular, the signaling of olfaction commences in contact with the ORNs over lamellae of the olfactory chamber and with inflowing water with odors (Hara 1986; Kasumyan 2004). So, the anatomy and histology of the olfactory organ seems to be important in fishes, which are affected by the olfaction, swimming pattern, water volume, bottom structure and water turbidity in habitats (Ferrando et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2016). Sometimes, the olfactory organ has been regarded the archetype for the morphological adaptation to fish-owned lifestyle (Kim and Park 2016; Malick et al. 2018).

The largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, belonging to the family Centrarchidae is a carnivorous species that shows multi colors with an olive-green to greenish gray, black, a jagged horizontal stripe along each flank in its body according to the variety of habitat where they have adapted, and inhabits lakes, ponds, swamps, brackish water and almost rivers (Kim and Park 2002). The fish is known for an invasive species which has been introduced into the world due to the popularity of its sport fishing (Richardson-Heft et al. 2000). In South Korea, it also has spread widely and rapidly throughout the water system of the Korean Peninsula since it was induced in 1973 for the purpose of fishery resources augmentation (Kim and Park 2002). So far, the colonization of M. salmoides in the Korean aquatic environment causes decline or extremely extinction of native freshwater fishes and aquatic insects by predation and competition between them (Lee et al. 2013), so that this is making same serious issues in other countries after its introduction (Pereira and Vitule 2019). With this ecological disturbance of M. salmoides, their sensory ability for catching prey or swimming have been tested in previous studies of a foraging success at different light intensities (McMahon and Holanov 1995), the feeding modalities to sensory deprivation (Gardiner and Motta 2012), its color vision (Mitchem et al. 2018), the feeding behavior by colocalization of teeth and taste buds (Linser et al. 1998), in reduction or elimination of its population. Although many teleost fishes rely on a using of vision or olfaction in feeding mechanism (Hara 1986), a valuable data of the olfactory organ conducting olfaction is not revealed in anatomy and histology. So, the aim of this study is to describe anatomy, ultrastructure and histology of the olfactory organ of M. salmoides and analyze a relation to its ecology.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

Twenty M. salmoides (Fig. 1a) with a variety of sizes (12.5 to 44.2 cm in standard length) were caught using a fishing rod and a cast net (7 × 7 in mesh) from March to October 2019 in the Daeyul reservoir (Fig. 1b, 35°47′36″N, 127°02′25″E) and the Jeonju Stream (35°50′39″N, 127°06′18″E) in South Korea. All procedures for this study were performed according to the rules under the Chonbuk National University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The collected fishes were anesthetized with 0.1% m-aminobenzoic acid ethylester methanesulfonate (MS222, Sigma, St Louis, MO) in the field. Then ten were fixed with 10% neutral formalin solution (pH 7.4) and the rest were kept in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (pH 7.4) with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (GA solution), respectively.

Fig. 1
figure1

The species photograph a and the habitat (b, the Daeyul reservoir) of Micropterus salmoides. The bar indicates 5 cm

Microscopic investigation

For checking the anatomical structure of the olfactory organ, the five specimens in 10% formalin solution were dissected using an anatomical blade (Feather Safety Razor Co., Ltd., Japan) from the snout of the fish’s head under a stereo microscope (SM; Stemi DV4; Carl Zeiss, Germany). It was filmed for detailed anatomy by a digital camera (TG-3, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For light microscopy, the olfactory tissue extracted from the snout were dehydrated properly with a series of graded ethanol solutions, cleaned with xylene, and then embedded in paraffin wax (Paraplast, Oxford) for 24 h. Five-micrometer serial sections of the tissue’s paraffin block were cut by a rotary microtome (Leica 820, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), deparaffinized with xylene, dehydrated in descending series of alcohol solutions. They were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (H-E) (Gurr 1956) for a general histology and then observed under a light microscope (LM; Imager A1, Carl Zeiss, Germany). For scanning electron microscopy, the olfactory organ fixed was fixed with GA solution again for 24 h due to the lack of infiltration capacity to the tissue at the first fixation with GA solution. And then it was post-fixed 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated in ascending series of alcohol solutions, transferred to tert-butyl alcohol, freeze-dried in vacuum chamber by a freeze dryer (VFD-21S t-butanol freeze dryer, Shinkuu, Mito, Japan), ion-sputter coated with osmium. They were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM; Carl Zeiss, SUPRA 40VP, Germany).

Results

Anatomy

The paired olfactory organs below the eyes of M. salmoides consist externally of an anterior nostril and a posterior nostril (Fig. 2). The anterior nostril was tubular structure with a circular opening protruded over the skin and the posterior nostril has an angular opening flat to the skin (Fig. 2a). In the internal view of adult fish over 35 cm in SL, it was confirmed that the olfactory chamber has a rosette structure with 9 to 11 lamellae and two inward holes, ethmoidal and lacrimal accessory nasal sac. The rosette structure appears to be a fan shape with lamella and a medium raphe in arrangement. The distal part of each lamella tends to be larger than the proximal part in its thickness (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure2

The diagrams in front (left) and side (right) views of the head of Micropterus salmoides (adult) and the anatomical structure (external, a; internal, b) of its olfactory organ. AN, anterior nostril; ENS, ethmoidal accessory nasal sac; L, lamellae; LNS, lacrymal accessory nasal sac; PN, posterior nostril; R, medium raphe

Histology

Each olfactory lamella has the sensory epithelium (SE), the non-sensory epithelium (NSE) and the connective tissue, so called fila olfactoria (Fig. 3a). The SE is a pseudostratified layer with variable cells such as the ORNs, supporting cells (SCs), basal cells (BCs), lymphatic cells (LCs) and mucous cells (MCs) (Fig. 3b). With dendrites and axons, the ORNs are a bipolar cell that expands their body to the outermost surface and the basement membrane. They show an elongated nucleus with a deep violet color stained with hematoxylin. The SCs have an elliptical nucleus with weaker violet color than that of the ORNs. Their cytoplasm is cylindrical, being expanded from the bottom to apical surface of the olfactory epithelium. The BCs are a polygonal cell located horizontally and vertically at the basal part of the olfactory epithelium and also show a weak violet color like the SCs. The LCs are a small circular cell with deep dark color stained with hematoxylin and has a very little cytoplasm. The MCs are a large and guttiform cell that is situated at the apical part of the olfactory epithelium and appears abundantly on the SE. They have a flat nucleus with a deep violet color at the bottom of the cell body (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure3

The histological and cytological characteristics of the olfactory epithelium of Micropterus salmoides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin. a the lamellae with the sensory epithelia on its both sides; b the sensory epithelium with olfactory receptor neurons, supporting cells, basal cells, lymphatic cells and mucous cells; c the non-sensory epithelium with stratified epithelial cells, lymphatic cells and mucous cells. Arrowhead, mucous cell; asterisk, mucous cell; BC, basal cell; FO, fila olfactoria; LC, lymphatic cell; NSE, non-sensory epithelium; ORN, olfactory receptor neuron; SC, supporting cell; SE, sensory epithelium. The bars indicate 200 μm in A and 20 μm in B and C, respectively

Meanwhile, the NSE is a stratified squamous epithelium that shows an irregularly curved line in its surface (Fig. 3c). It consists of stratified epithelial cells (SECs), the LCs and the MCs. The SECs are a polygonal cell with nucleus located randomly in its wide cytoplasm and a weak violet color. Sharing the same characters to that of the SE, the LCs are visible in all part of the epithelial layer, and numerous in number. The MCs are dense and continuous along the surface line of the NSE and show a faint color negative for hematoxylin in their cytoplasm. Their cytological characteristics are similar to that of the SE (Fig. 3c).

The rosette structure of M. salmoides transforms a longitudinal type in parallel with one another (Fig. 4a) into a fan-shaped type arranged radially on the basis of the medium raphe (Fig. 4b). The former type appears in young fish under 15 cm. As the young fish grow, adult fish over 35 cm change to the latter, which is over twice the diameter size of the former. The SE area on the olfactory lamella shows continuous distribution in its developmental pattern on the surface (Fig. 4d) with numerous and dense cilia. In contrast, the NSE shows two distinct parts: A type of the region mixed with ciliated and non-ciliated cells (Fig. 4e), and B type of the only non-ciliated region to form spiral pattern of microridges (Fig. 4g). The NSE in the outer margin of the lamella and the connected part of the inner floor and the lamella shows A type (Fig. 4c) whereas in the medium raphe and the inner floor it is B type (Fig. 4f). Rarely, the patches of the SE are observable among A type of the NSE (Fig. 4h).

Fig. 4
figure4

Scanning electron micrographs showing the olfactory lamellar surface of Micropterus salmoides. a the olfactory rosette of young fish under 15 cm (SL); b the olfactory rosette of adult fish over 35 cm (SL); c the surface area divided into two regions, sensory and non-sensory epitheliums; d the sensory epithelium with numerous cilia; e the non-sensory epithelium with mucous openings and motile cilia; f the non-sensory epithelium consisting of two regions, with and without cilia; g the non-sensory epithelium with spiral patterns of microridges; h the sensory epithelia among the non-sensory epithelium. Arrow, cilia; arrowhead, mucous opening; circle, non-sensory area without cilia; ellipse, non-sensory area with cilia; L, lamellae; R, medium raphe; SE, sensory epithelium; NSE, non-sensory epithelium. The bars indicate 200 μm in A, 500 μm in B, 20 μm in C, D, E, F, 5 μm in G and H, respectively

Discussion

The family Centrarchidae prefers to live around aquatic vegetation and hide near it in warm and slower-moving water (Berra 2001). Among them, although M. salmoides depends on its well-developed eyes to catch prey in sight (Crowl 1989), it is clear that other sensory organs are needed. In particular, olfaction is very useful to perceive any change in aquatic environments that they may be faced (Janzow 1978; Kubitza et al. 1997).

The anatomical features of M. salmoides are as follows: a tubular-anterior nostril to stick out, fan-shaped lamellae with 9 to 11 units arranged radially on the medium raphe, and two accessory nasal sacs. The tubular-anterior nostril has been well-known in most of the Perciformes as a tube- or a tentacle-like hole located at a differing position of their snout (Murase 2007; Padate et al. 2017; Zeiske et al. 1992). Generally, such nostril has been identified in benthic or settled fishes, to maintain a benthic strategy, move slowly and remain motionless in at least part of their whole life history (Kasumyan 2004; Cox 2008). M. salmoides, however, shows meso-pelagic life to swim middle or upper layer of the water (Kim and Park 2002). Despite the difference in their ecological aspects, it is very interesting in that M. salmoides has a tubular anterior nostril. The function of two accessory nasal sacs seen in this fish has been known as an intentional water ventilation of the olfactory chamber in habitat environment with standing or slow water (Pashchenko and Kasumyan 2019).

The rosette structure, a lamellar organization projected from the inner wall of the olfactory chamber, has been reported in adult of many teleost fishes (Hara 1986; Atta 2013). In the arrangement of rosette with lamellae, Yamamoto (1982) classified into eight types: i) absence of lamella, ii) longitudinal one, iii) transverse one, iv) longitudinal lamellae parallel to another units, v) fan-shaped lamellae, vi) lamellae radiating from a raphe, vii) lamellae arranged transversely or obliquely to an elongated raphe, viii) transverse lamellae with mostly same size arranged from a long raphe. With above types, Kasumyan (2004) added two cases: i) two longitudinal lamellae, ii) lamellae of same size radiating from centered raphe. The above reports confirmed that the rosette structure remain unchanged for their whole life time. Unlike the reports, the rosette structure of M. salmoides shows the changes by growth: longitudinal lamellae in younger fish transforms into fan-shaped lamellae in adult fish. There were only some studies that adult fish tends to have a larger number of lamellae than young fish to increase the area in contact with odor and the ORNs as the fish’s olfactory sensitivity may be related to increase in lamellae number (Kasumyan 2004; Kudo et al. 2009). The general anatomy of the olfactory organ in the same species remains unchanged regardless size and age of fishes, and habitat they live in (Zeiske et al. 1992; Kasumyan 2004). However, the arrangement of the rosette structure is different and unique by species (Yamamoto 1982; Ferrando et al. 2017). Meanwhile, the lamellae number is variable between individuals with growth, size, and age (Tilney and Hecht 1990).

The morphology of the lamellae also is known to be affected by a ventilatory aspect of water in the olfactory chamber and fish’s swimming (Ferrando et al. 2016). Consequently, such transformation for M. salmoides, is a rare phenomenon in the olfactory organ of teleost fishes.

The olfactory epithelium of teleost fishes has generally the ORNs, the SCs, the BC within the SE, the SECs and the MCs within the NSE (Hara 1994). Sometimes, very few MCs occur on the SE (Hara 1986). Unusually, M. salmoides is remarkable that the MCs are lined densely and abundantly in the superficial surface of the SE. The presence of the MC in the SE may be a unique phenomenon. The MCs produce more mucus when fish face a habitat environment with contaminated water chemically (Kasumyan 2004). Therefore, as M. salmoides has a strong tolerance in turbid or contaminated water, the appearance of the MCs in the SE may be related with the hypothesis reported above regarding at least its ecological aspects.

Numerous cilia of the SE and many LCs of the NSE in M. salmoides are found. According to Doving (1977), it was studied the cilia assist the movement of water or mucus over the epithelia. The LCs are functioned as part of cell immunity (Lieschke and Trede 2009).

From the above data, the gross structure and histological characteristics of the olfactory organ of M. salmoides in mesopelagic ecology may be likely considered as one of strategy to adapt for stagnant and more contaminated water rather than clear and rapid one.

Conclusion

The paired olfactory organ of Micropterus salmoides shows remarkable characters: i) a tubular anterior nostril to stick out, ii) a posterior nostril flat to the skin surface, iii) two accessory nasal sacs, ethmoidal and lacrimal sacs, v) a rosette structure transforming longitudinal lamellae (adult fish) in parallel with each other into a fan-shaped lamellae (younger fish) in arrangement, vi) mucous cells being dense and continuous on the sensory epithelium, vii) numerous lymphatic cells in the non-sensory epithelium. Such olfactory characters may be related with a habit spending in the middle layer of stagnant water contaminated, more or less.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

BC:

basal cell

GA:

glutaraldehyde

LC:

lymphatic cell

LM:

light microscope

MC:

mucous cell

NSE:

non-sensory epithelium

ORN:

olfactory receptor neuron

SC:

supporting cell

SE:

sensory epithelium

SEC:

stratified epithelial cell

SEM:

scanning electron microscope

SL:

standard length

SM:

stereo microscope

References

  1. K.I. Atta, Morphological, anatomical and histological studies on the olfactory organs and eyes of teleost fish: Anguilla anguilla in relation to its feeding habits. J. Basic Appl. Zool. 66, 101–108 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T.M. Berra, Freshwater Fish Distribution (Academic Press, New York, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.P. Cox, Hydrodynamic aspects of fish olfaction. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 575–593 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.A. Crowl, Effects of crayfish size, orientation, and movement on the reactive distance of largemouth bass foraging in clear and turbid water. Hydrobiologia 183, 133–140 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K.B. Doving, M. Dubois-Dauphin, A. Holley, F. Jourdan, Functional anatomy of the olfactory organ of fish and the ciliary mechanism of water transport. Acta Zool. 58, 245–255 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Ferrando, L. Gallus, L. Ghigliotti, M. Vacchi, J. Nielsen, J.S. Christiansen, E. Pisano, Gross morphology and histology of the olfactory organ of the Greenland shark Somniosus microcephalus. Polar Biol. 39, 1399–1409 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ferrando, L. Gallus, A. Amaroli, C. Gambardella, B. Waryani, D. Di Blasi, M. Vacchi, Gross anatomy and histology of the olfactory rosette of the shark Heptranchias perlo. Zoology 122, 27–37 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.M. Gardiner, P.J. Motta, Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) switch feeding modalities in response to sensory deprivation. Zoology 115, 78–83 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G.T. Gurr, A Practical Manual of Medical and Biological Staining Techniques (Interscience, New York, 1956), pp. 1–99

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.R. Hanson, P.W. Sorensen, Y. Cohenc, Sex pheromones and amino acids evoke distinctly different spatial patterns of electrical activity in the goldfish olfactory bulb. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 855, 521–524 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T.J. Hara, Role of olfaction in fish behaviour, in The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, (Springer, US, 1986), pp. 152–176

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.J. Hara, The diversity of chemical stimulation in fish olfaction and gustation. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fisheries 4, 1–35 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F.T. Janzow, Sensory Basis of Social Behavior in the Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides). Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University (1978)

  14. A.O. Kasumyan, The olfactory system in fish: Structure, function, and role in behavior. J. Ichthyol. 44, 180–223 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. I.S. Kim, J.Y. Park, Freshwater Fishes of Korea (Kyo-Hak Publishing, Seoul, 2002) (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.T. Kim, J.Y. Park, The anatomy and histoarchitecture of the olfactory organ in the Korean flat-headed goby Luciogobius guttatus (Pisces; Gobiidae). Appl. Microsc. 46, 51–57 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H.T. Kim, H.S. Kim, J.Y. Park, The anatomy and histology of the olfactory organ in the Korean sand goby Favonigobius gymnauchen (Pisces, Gobiidae). Korean J. Ichthyol. 28, 29–35 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Kubitza, L.L. Lovshin, R.T. Lovell, Identification of feed enhancers for juvenile largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Aquaculture 148, 191–200 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Kudo, M. Shinto, Y. Sakurai, M. Kaeriyama, Morphometry of olfactory lamellae and olfactory receptor neurons during the life history of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta). Chem. Senses 34, 617–624 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.W. Lee, J.H. Kim, S.H. Park, K.R. Choi, H.J. Lee, J.D. Yoon, M.H. Jang, Impact of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) on the population of Korean native fish, crucian carp (Carassius auratus). Korean J. Environ. Biol. 31, 370–375 (2013) (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. G.J. Lieschke, N.S. Trede, Fish immunology. Curr. Biol. 19, R678–R682 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P.J. Linser, W.E. Carr, H.S. Cate, C.D. Derby, J.C. Netherton 3rd, Functional significance of the co-localization of taste buds and teeth in the pharyngeal jaws of the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Biol. Bull. 195, 273–281 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Malick, S.K. Chatterjee, S. Bhattacharya, V.R. Suresh, R. Kundu, S.K. Saikia, Structural organization of the olfactory organ in an amphihaline migratory fish Hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha. Micr. Res. Tech. 81, 1122–1131 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T.E. McMahon, S.H. Holanov, Foraging success of largemouth bass at different light intensities: Implications for time and depth of feeding. J. Fish Biol. 46, 759–767 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L.D. Mitchem, S. Stanis, M. Zhou, E. Loew, J.M. Epifanio, R.C. Fuller, Seeing red: Color vision in the largemouth bass. Curr. Zool. 65, 43–52 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Murase, A new species of the blenniid fish, Laiphognathus longispinis (Perciformes: Blenniidae), from southern Japan and Taiwan. Ichthyol. Res. 54, 287–296 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Okada, The taste system of small fish species. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 79, 1039–1043 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. V.P. Padate, C.U. Rivonker, A.C. Anil, S.S. Sawant, K. Venkat, New records of marine fishes from the coral reefs and deep waters of Gulf of Mannar, India. Acta Ichthyol. Piscatoria 44, 241–248 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. N.I. Pashchenko, A.O. Kasumyan, Morphology and ventilation of the olfactory organ in the Indo-Pacific sergeant Abudefduf vaigiensis (Pomacentridae). J. Ichthyol. 59, 167–173 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. F.W. Pereira, J.R.S. Vitule, The largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède, 1802): Impacts of a powerful freshwater fish predator outside of its native range. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 29, 639–652 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C.A. Richardson-Heft, A.A. Heft, L. Fewlass, S.B. Brandt, Movement of largemouth bass in northern Chesapeake Bay: Relevance to sportfishing tournaments. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 20, 493–501 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R.L. Tilney, T. Hecht, The food and feeding habits of two co-occurring marine catfish Galeichthys feliceps and G. ater (Osteichthyes: Ariidae) along the south-east coast of South Africa. J. Zool. 221(2), 171–193 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Yamamoto, Comparative morphology of the peripheral olfactory organs in teleosts, in Chemoreception in Fishes, ed. by T. J. Hara, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 39–59

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Zeiske, B. Theisen, H. Breucker, Structure, development, and evolutionary aspects of the peripheral olfactory system, in Fish Chemoreception, ed. by T. J. Hara, (Springer, Netherlands, 1992), pp. 13–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors' contributions

JYP edited and approved the manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03028268).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong Young Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.T., Yun, S.W. & Park, J.Y. Anatomy, ultrastructure and histology of the olfactory organ of the largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides, Centrarchidae. Appl. Microsc. 49, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42649-019-0023-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • The olfactory organ
  • Rosette structure
  • Lamellae
  • Mucous cells
  • The largemouth bass